This week, in fact, by the end of today, we’re putting together a design for a web site.
I will use a hierarchical structure, because this is what we most often encounter, and it would be useful to structure such a site as a learning exercise.
However, in terms of the way we could organize and access information, I am much more interested in the approach and described in David Weinberger’s book, Everything is Miscellaneous. The idea behind this book is that technology now allows us to structure information in an unstructured way. Since that sounds contradictory, I will try to explain. The book uses the analogy of a library, where the books are placed in a certain order, using a structure such as the Library of Congress Classification System or the Dewey Decimal System. In the case of a physical object like a book, we don’t have much choice. It needs to have a physical location if we’re going to be able to find a later.
With electronic data, we don’t have to assign a particular place to each object. However, we still need a way to access, retrieve, or find it. And our criteria for finding the object may be different from the next person’s. Technology makes this ability to retrieve a piece of information according to the users’ way of viewing it possible. We can do this by tagging the objects using metadata. So, for instance a web page that lists information on visiting Rome could be tagged with a number of tags: Italy, Classical architecture, Roman Catholicism, Michelangelo, the Vatican, the Spanish steps, etc. A search engine on that site would retrieve the page if any of those search tags were chosen by the user.
The organizational structure described in our Chapter three reading that comes closest to this approach is the database structure (p.10). However the third bullet in the database description talks about the importance of a flowchart which would show how the information is organized and connected. In a miscellaneous structure, there would not necessarily be connections between the items. Some of them might share the same tag, of course, but there would not have to be links between them from an organizational perspective. Maybe the last bullet in that list, which has no words besides it, represents this concept.
I don’t think you could design a web site that used only this structure, unless it was just a search engine site. But it would be an interesting alternative on a site, as a way to accommodate users’ differing associations with the same information.
June 16, 2009 at 4:48 pm |
Hi Barry,
Thanks for pointing to this reference. It sounds like a good and informative read.
If you are interested in “miscellaneous site design, then you might be interested in pursuing the topic of metadata.
One of the interesting challenges of search engines is knowing what the user is looking for. Consider the example of a word that has two possible meanings or connotations, but the same spelling – i.e. Heteronyms. (Egs. _Excuse_ me/ That was his _excuse_ …. Or Please wait a _minute_/ That was a _minute_ detail. … Or “The _wind_ was brisk”/ Please _wind_ the clock.” … You get the idea.
Metadata helps search engines to make these kinds of distinctions. It provides additional higher level information about the information.
You can experiment with this type of ‘miscellany of words’ by creating a word association map using Visual Thesaurus.
http://www.visualthesaurus.com
It might accommodate the type of structure that you are interested in achieving.
Nancy